Traitor in high heels

Here it is - evidence of treason.

In open defiance of official U.S. Foreign policy, the Speaker of the House of U.S. Representatives went to meet with an enemy of the U.S. anyways (Pres. Bashar Assad of Syria, for those of you not paying attention - and yes Syria is allowing and supporting terrorists to enter Iraq, therefore they qualify as enemy).

If you voted for the Democrat party in the national election, shame on you because you empowered this act of treason to occur.

What these Democrats don't realize, is that they are forever damaging the office of the Presidency with these subversive and irresponsible actions. This is bigger than our current president, this will have long lasting implications even after George W. Bush retires from public office. I'm talking big picture here...can they not overlook their hatred and disrespect for one man to consider this? guess not. If you don't see a problem here, my faithful blog readers, then you too don't 'get it'.

Who exactly is in charge of our foreign policy? I suspect that the Speaker of the House believes it is her. Well the Constitution of the U.S. says otherwise, maybe she should read it before aiding and abetting our enemies.

This just makes my blood boil....

Allow me to Rant a Minute...

Yes, I know some of you all have really been missing 'ANGRY PAT', well I just thought I would throw this group of you some red meat to devour just this one time - for old time's sake..

It's about the Democrats in Congress.

What is up with all this anti-war 'resolution' crap? Not only has it now become ridiculous the amount of resolutions the Democratic leadership has brought to the congressional floor, but none of them have any binding power ('teeth'). Whats the point?? Seriously? It's not like there's anything else they could be spending their time on, you know that could say...actually DO SOMETHING positive for our country? Oh wait, I guess it would really be helpful if they could get Pres. Bush to say that the US Military is 'overburdened'.....*sigh*

It's like being in the back of a car on a road trip with their family, and the Democrat's Dad is driving and they're in the backseat moaning 'I don't like the way you drive! I'm going to get you to apologize for taking us cross country on this trip! I HATE you! I wish you weren't my Daddy!.. WAHHHH!!' It only makes the trip more painful and doesn't make any difference anyways.

It's way beyond obvious to me that the only reason these people get out of bed in the morning is to embarrass President Bush in any possible way, shape or form. If that means siding with our enemies and encouraging them with 'resolutions' that mean nothing but send loud statements to our enemies that we are weak, then so be it. It's very very hard to believe that these people represent the best in American leadership when they can't get over their hatred for one man. Are they really that petty? (apparently, yes)

Sure, President Bush has his problems, and I don't support all his actions, but really - don't you people have anything better to do?

This is a serious question for you blog readers out there...what really is the true point of this other than embarrassing a sitting Commander in Chief? And I'm not even going to mention what would happen if the Democrats got their way in the war on terror (suicide bombers in local malls anyone?)

Whose side are they on anyways? I really honestly don't know... I guess the answer to that would be their own. Not the USA's, that's for sure.

Oh and if you voted for any of these people (here in Georgia none of them were on my ballot..), then SHAME ON YOU. Vote for someone that actually gives a crap about doing something for our future for once, not spending all their energy on worthless tantrums.

Vote Democrat, the party of Surrender!

Here it is. The House bill titled "Expressing the commitment of the House of Representatives to achieving victory in Iraq" was voted on last Friday.

108 Democrats voted against it.

Hmm...if I didn't know any better I'd think most of the house Dems are not committed to helping us win in Iraq (59 Dems voted for it, these must be the ones that actually like their home country).

Is this considered 'patriotic dissent'? Looks more like treason to me.

This War Sucks

A guest blogger appears on Iowahawk's blog to post about the War in Iraq. Ever wonder what the War on Terror looks like from the Al Qaeda point of view? Read on.

***WARNING - CONTAINS ADULT LANGUAGE****

The Zarkman on the Iraq War

I promise to keep my posts clean from now on, and most of my links will be to family friendly sites, but man, is this stuff FUNNY. I had to share.

Article on the "Big Picture" in the Middle East

I found this latest Mark Steyn article via Little Green Footballs.

Please read this brilliant article and try to understand why I get so worked up about a certain political party's attempts to stymie something that will change the world for the better - and all because of politics.

Click and read me.

Once again, I will reiterate my position on this issue, it transcends internal American political parties, always has. If Bill Clinton was president now and was leading the War On Terror: Iraq Front, I would be 100% supportive of his efforts and our military's efforts. Just so you know.

Thoughts on a Tuesday Morning...

As you all may know, the Gamecocks beat Florida this past Saturday for the first time since 1939. I am slightly happy (understatement). I never thought this day would come - we have beaten Tennessee and Florida in the same year, and darn near beat Georgia to boot. Maybe next year. Either way, we are assured of getting a decent bowl game this year and an even better one when we beat the hated Clumpson Tiggers this Saturday. BOOO TIGGERS!

I saw a banner someone hung on an overpass over Georgia 400 on the way into work this morning, it said 'Who would Jesus torture?'. I don't know exactly what this means, but I suppose the person that hung it up there was referring to the treatment of Islamic Terrorist murderers by the U.S. Government in the current War on Terror. The sign makes a good point, and basically encapsulates this war raging, Jesus wouldn't torture anyone, and we all know from Christian teachings that we should love thy neighbor and be kind and all that.

I guess the real question to be asked would be 'Who would Muhammad torture?' and then we would have our answer. How about a banner reading 'Who would Muhammad Suicide Bomb?', or 'Who would Muhammad behead?', these would more accurately portray the state of current world events.

Needless to say I don't really know if the author of that banner was for or against our treatment of Islamic Radical Terrorists (murderers)or not (actually I do), but I can guess that the author is against anything the U.S. does to protect themselves, and is blind to the duality inherent in the statement that they hung over a captive audience of commuters on their way to work.

Good job. Definitely makes me realize how right we are in this war.

Oh and I bet the banner smells like patchoulli.

Follow up to the Democrats Temper Tantrum yesterday..

Yesterday the Democrat leadership invoked Floor Rule #21 which effectively closed the Senate floor to the public and they brought up the issue of pre-war intelligence and WMDs AGAIN.

I just wanted to give you all a link to show you what a group of hypocritical liars the current Democratic leadership in this country is composed of. As if this issue wasn't settled once and for all, it seems the Democrats suffer from chronic memory loss:

enjoy.

At least I know the Fat Drunk from Taxachussetts has an excuse.

- Thanks to Little Green Footballs

Media and the War

The media is now trumpeting the 2000th American Soldier casualty in the war in Iraq. I swear if I didn't know any better I would think that the media in conjunction with 'peace' groups are rooting for our soldiers to die just because they don't like our current president. These 'peace' groups are planning all sorts of demonstrations, rallies, and marches (read celebrations) to mark this ghoulish 'milestone'. I use their word 'milestone', because it is not a milestone. A milestone used in the proper sense gives a connotation of accomplishment, a marker on the way to a goal. Do the media and these 'peace' groups regard this as a milestone because their goal is to see our military fail and all our soldiers die in combat? Some, many actually, would say 'yes'. Read this from someone much more well written than I.

Once again this reinforces my exasperation with the state of politics in this country, because we actually hear about these 'peace' groups and the media is totally slanted against this effort in Iraq, talking constantly about all the casualties and not about the successes and the fact that we are winning this war. Need proof?

The Iraqis just passed a National constitution.

Didn't hear about it? Not surprised, the media didn't play it up at all because it makes President Bush look good, although he is not directly responsible for this. The Iraqi people are.

I fail to understand how anyone with any sense at all can think that the right thing to do now is to just pull up and leave from Iraq because of some overblown sense of defeat, or because it was the 'wrong thing to do' in the first place (even though it wasn't and there are mountains of evidence and UN resolutions supporting the invasion of Saddam's Iraq). Give me a break. We totally kicked their asses, and still are over there kicking more ass. Tell me where we've lost?

I pray for the day that Americans as a whole, and in particular the media, overlook political differences and understand that this war is bigger than George W. Bush, or Republicans, or abortion rights, or whatever the hell their pet issue of the day is.

Until then I am sure the beat will go on, and eventually the media may get its way, a Democrat will get elected, and we will lose. Be careful what you wish for, idiots.

UPDATE: For a follow up to what I was saying about this 'milestone' crap - check out these people in full party mode. Ghouls.
-Courtesy Little Green Footballs

From the Looney Department

So what's the story with this Hugo Chavez guy in Venezuela? Is he trying to take away the 'Most Deluded and Paranaoic Person' Award away from Cynthia al-McKinney?

Check this out!

Here's a paragraph that makes perfect sense. If you're on Venezuelan coke.

"We have detected with intelligence reports plans of a supposed invasion, one that would never happen. But we have to denounce it," Chavez told British Broadcasting Corp. radio.

I couldn't even think of writing this stuff it's so rich! but Wait! it gets better!

"It is an imperialist government, one that says it fights against terrorism but protects it. The U.S. throws stones to Latin America," Chavez said.

'Throws Stones'? Boy do I want some of what he's smoking. This wouldn't be so dang funny if he was the leader of an actual country with an actual government and military.

Oh well, I guess we'd better invade them anyways to get more oil supply because this Iraq thing only brought our gas prices down to just 3 dollars a gallon. Maybe we can get it even further down.... muwahHAHAHAHA!!

Random Friday Thoughts

- Getting glass in your foot really hurts. If at all possible avoid doing so, because trust me, you will be mega-gimpy for a few days until you have to see a surgeon to get it pulled out.

- Will the Gamecocks rebound and beat Troy University on Saturday after the thumping they received from Bama last weekend? Does anyone besides myself care?

- Rita is bearing down on Texas and will hit it hard. New Orleans is flooding again as I type this. Our gas prices will be affected by another huge hurricane. Is someone upstairs trying to tell us something?? I'm just asking....

- I have determined that Natural Lite Ice in a can is horrible. It's like drinking water with alcohol added to fool you into liking it. Oh I just bought it to grill beer can chicken with, I'm still a beer snob.

- After winning two presidential elections, people still call our President an idiot. Doesn't say much towards his competition or the people that say that about him in the first place. It has to take SOMETHING in the brain department to accomplish something like becoming the chief executive and Commander in Chief in a constitutional republic.

- My fantasy football team won laast weekend. YAY! Wonder if I'll make it two in a row? I'm playing my buddy Renato's wife, and she's been talking smack. You go girl (but not this weekend)!

- Best wishes and godspeed to my good friend Renato who has shipped to Iraq to serve our country. We will miss him horribly, but are extremely proud of what he is going to accomplish with his and his family's sacrifice. I plan on attending his welcome home party next year and toasting with a nice cold one. He is a man of true honor and duty, and for that we are all thankful.

- Dang, what does one guy gotta do to get some comments on his Blog? Advertise free beer?

- Good friend of mine yesterday at lunch told me when I asked him if he read my blog that he doesn't like to read them because its usually just a bunch of ranting about stuff. I don't do that do I??? *coy look*

Heres a good laugh....

Check this out, the 'world' is demanding that the U.N. take charge in the War on Terror. haha.

OK. four years ago, the terrorists hit us, the U.S. HARD. We got a clue. We hit 'em back, and we hit 'em HARD. The rest of the world whined and moaned "Bush's rush to War!" and "unchecked American Power!" and other nonsense. Terrorism is now (and has been for decades) spreading all over the world and they realize that they need to stop it. Unfortunately, the U.N. is not the way to go about it, and that has been made clear many times over. Anti-Americanism still taints this war and they will not help the U.S. and its allies fight it, even if it means thousands of their own innocent people dying. The reasons for not helping the U.S. abound, and they're all lame socialist excuses. This is serious and most of us know it.

However, the U.N. is not serious. It has not been for many decades, and it is even worse now. Any effort towards getting help from the U.N. versus dismantling it, is wasted effort. Unfortunately, terror will strike these countries while they plead with the U.N. for help, and they won't get any. For that I feel truly sorry for those people.

Once again I pray and hope for every single American Soldier that is fighting terror in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Philippines, and elsewhere that we are not aware of. I also pray and hope for the British, Australian, Polish, Iraqi, Israeli, Czech, Japanese, and other troops that are there fighting along side us. You know, the other countries that are fighting in this 'unilateral' war.

They have a clue. and so does the U.S.

I pray it's not too late for the rest of 'em.

From the 'where were you before 2003?' files:

Death Toll at 825 Since New Iraq Gov't

Looks like the AP has found a new tally to keep. Good for them! I just wonder why they didn't keep a body count before the U.S. Invasion in 2003 deposed one of the bloodiest dictators in history.

Wait, I know why! Because they couldn't possibly pin all of those mass graves and mysterious deaths on President Bush!

Do I get a cookie?

Oh and in case you didn't catch it, there is ONE mention of the word terrorist in this article, and it's in scare quotes. According to the brilliant minds at the AP, the people that are actually responsible for taking all these innocent lives by blowing themselves up in mosques and in public markets aren't 'terrorists'. Nah, they're rebels. Or insurgents. Or some other glorious moniker for a bunch of murdering thugs.

AP = Anti-American, Anti-Iraqi Ghouls.